Seegelken v. Corey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The action is ejectment to recover “lot 4 of section 30, in township 15 south, of range 3 east, M. D. M.,” situate in the county of Monterey, the complaint being in the usual form, but not verified.
The answer “ denies generally and specifically each and every allegation in the said complaint.”
The defendant also filed a cross-complaint, in which he alleged, substantially, the following facts: That on June 17, 1885, Frederick Egan executed to defendant a quitclaim deed for land therein described as follows: “ All that part of lot 5 in section 30, of township 15 south, of range 3…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Auerbach v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Spirt v. AlbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Robertson v. MelvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Kugler v. ScarboroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932