Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Carmichael

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 6, 1936No. 25752PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “Partners shall not be responsible for torts committed by a copartner. Eor the negligence or torts of their agents or servants they are responsible under the same rules which apply to individuals.” Code, § 75-308. In view of the first sentence in the quoted section, the second sentence should be construed as referring only to those “agents or servants” who are agents or servants of the partnership and who are not members thereof, and not to the partners themselves. Osborn v. Woolworth, 106 Ga. 459, 460 (32 S. E. 581) ; Corbett v. Connor, 11 Ga. App. 385, 387 (75 S. E. 492). “The first part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ozborn v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Martin v. Simkins CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Corbett & Taylor v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Goodrich v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Holley v. SneedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API