Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1924No. 15434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Conceding (but not deciding) that the advertisement inserted in the newspaper by A. Goldstein was libelous, and that the evidence adduced upon the trial sufficiently proved that this defendant and the other named defendants were partners as alleged, still we are of the opinion that the trial court’s judgment was in accord with the law of this State, expressed in Battle v. Pennington, 14 Ga. App. 58 (80 S. E. 298), in which case it was said: “It seems to us that this question [whether or not a partnership is liable for a tort committed by one of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ozborn v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Corbett & Taylor v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Battle v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holley v. SneedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Rogers v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API