Legal Opinion

Corbett & Taylor v. Connor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 31, 1912No. 3881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Moultrie — Judge McKenzie. October 21, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. Mary E. Connor obtained a verdict and judgment against Corbett & Taylor, a partnership, and K. J. Corbett and G. F. Taylor, members of the partnership, for the negligent homicide of her husband. The defendants excepted to the overruling of a general demurrer to the petition, and the refusal of their motion for a new trial. The material facts, briefly stated, are as follows: Corbett & Taylor were engaged in the sawmill and timber business, and in connection with this business operated locomotives and cars on and over the tracks of the Flint Kiver & Northeastern Kailroad, by permission of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Ozborn v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Austin v. ApplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Martin v. Simkins CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Zakas Bakery v. LipesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Battle v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Goodrich v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Rogers v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API