Legal Opinion

Mruz v. Caring, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 26, 2001No. CIV. A. 97CV01468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, John Mruz, Vasilike D. Nika, and Jane Johnson, as well as their attorney, Gary Green, Esq., individually, have appealed the Order of Magistrate Judge Robert B. Kugler which granted Defendants’ motion to revoke the pro hac vice admission of Mr. Green. The issue presented by this appeal is whether Judge Kugler’s invocation of the traditional inherent power of federal courts to sanction attorneys, in this case the revocation of a pro hac vice admission of an unruly and offensive attorney, survives the Third Circuit’s recent decision in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleversafe, Inc. v. Amplidata, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. In Re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  3. LABMD, INC. v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Lee v. The City of TroyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  5. Matylewicz v. County of Lackawanna Transit System Authority (COLTS)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API