Cleversafe, Inc. v. Amplidata, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to rules 26 and 37, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the defendant moved to strike what it called the plaintiffs “last minute assertion of brand new claims for the '771 Patent in its Local Patent Rule 3.1 Final Infringement Contentions, or, in the alternative, require Cleversafe to pay all of Ampli-data’s fees and costs associated with researching and preparing Local Patent Rule 3.1 Final Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions for the newly-asserted claims of the '771 Patent.” (Defendant’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'Toole v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Medgyesy v. MedgyesyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Belcastro v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Hangzhou Aoshuang E-Commerce Co., Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Oil-Dri Corporation of America v. Nestle Purina Petcare CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.