Legal Opinion

Seidenbach's v. Bland Terry Shoe Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1961No. Nos. 6583, 6584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for an accounting brought by Bland Terry Shoe Corporation against Seidenbach’s with jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship and a claim for $12,434.25 alleged due under a contract which had governed the relationship of the parties from January 1950 until January 1959. Seidenbach’s is an established department store in Tulsa, Oklahoma; Bland Terry is a Georgia corporation operating a chain of leased shoe departments in comparable outlets throughout the nation. Judgment favored Bland Terry in the sum of $8,718.20 based upon the trial court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Supply Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Cole v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seidenbach's, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Bland Terry Shoe Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Bland Terry Shoe Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Seidenbach's, an Oklahoma Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API