Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 7, 1942No. Record No. 2590PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In this record are two cases—one against the Commonwealth of Virginia and one against the City of Richmond. In each relevant facts are the same, as is the law applicable thereto. By consent they were heard together, and the issues there made have been decided in one final order.

Leonard Meyer and his three brothers make up a partnership and are meat packers whose place of business is in Richmond. They have been engaged since 1926 in that business, inherited from their father. They employ about twenty-nine workmen and have now invested $177,748.53. Seemingly they are prosperous. Their methods…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. County Commissioners of Carroll County v. B. F. Shriver Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Case v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Solite Corp. v. County of King GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  4. Prentice v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  5. Sayles Biltmore Bleacheries, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API