Legal Opinion

Totman v. Control Data Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1986No. 2-85-022-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

FENDER, Chief Justice.

In appellees’ Motion for Rehearing they contend that this court correctly affirmed the summary judgment concerning the contract cause of action but incorrectly reversed concerning the fraudulent inducement cause of action. Appellees contend that appellant did not assign a point of error regarding the granting of the summary judgment concerning the fraudulent inducement cause of action. We are now convinced that appellees are correct and that our partial reversal was based on unassigned error. See El Paso Environ. Systems v. Filtronics, 609…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hussong v. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Lee-Wright, Inc. v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Residential Dynamics, LLC v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Rios v. Texas Commerce Bancshares, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Hicks v. Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API