Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter G. Archibald

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 6, 2006No. 06-11882UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Appellant Peter G. Archibald (“Archibald”) challenges his convictions for knowingly and fraudulently concealing the assets of a bankruptcy estate, 18 U.S.C. § 152(1), and knowingly and fraudulently making a false oath in relation to a bankruptcy case, 18 U.S.C. § 152(2). Archibald raises a number of issues on appeal. First, he challenges the sufficiency of the criminal indictment pursuant to which he was charged. Archibald also argues that the district court erred in admitting certain evidence against him at trial and that the district court erred in calculating the amount of the monetary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Daniel Francisco RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Hernan Francisco Perez-Tosta, Gustavo Javier Correa-Patino, Erasmo Perez-Aguilera, Luis Guillermo Rojas-ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Margaret S. Rodriguez v. Donald E. RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MongoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. MongoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API