Legal Opinion

Jones v. Sikes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1926No. 17191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwobth, J.

1. “An assignment of error complaining of tire admission of documentary evidence over objection urged at the time it was admitted should set forth literally or in substance the evidence objected to, or identify it as an exhibit attached and made a part of the bill of exceptions. If it fails to do either, the assignment of error will not present any question for consideration. Bacon v. Howard, 152 Ga. 616 (2) (110 S. E. 888) ; Callaway v. Beauchamp, 140 Ga. 207 (2) (78 S. E. 846).” McBurnette v. Huff, 154 Ga. 452 (114 S. E. 578). See also McCollum v. *470Thomason, 32 Ga. App. 160 (8), 163 (122 S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Buchanan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Callaway v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. McBurnette v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sisk v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API