Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Beauchamp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Complaint for land. Before M. C. Edward's, judge pro hac vice. Quitman superior court. August 24, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. In order to authorize this court to reverse a judgment

allowing an amendment to pleading, the record must distinctly disclose, not only that objection to the allowance of such amendment was made at the time the same was allowed, but also the ground of such objection. McCowan v. Brooks, 113 Ga. 532 (4), 533 (39 S. E. 115).

2. A ground of a motion for new trial, complaining of the admission of documentary evidence over stated objections, which does not set forth the document in form or substance, is incomplete, and fails to set forth any question for decision. Stewart v. Bank, 100 Ga. 496 (2),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. McCowan v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Stewart Bros. v. Randall Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Stewart v. Bank of Social CircleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Aycock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. McCollum v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API