Legal Opinion
Hunter Innovations Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil 08-0671 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This diversity action arises from an alleged contractual relationship between plaintiff Hunter Innovations Company (“HIC”) and defendant The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (“Travelers”). The matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, and the entire record in the case, the Court will grant defendants’ motion. 1
I. BACKGROUND
HIC is a Virginia business that provides repair, improvement and refurbishment services for historical properties. See Compl. ¶ 1. On December…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Moms Against Mercury v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landmark Health Solutions LLC v. Not for Profit Hospital CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- American Civil Construction, LLC v. Fort Myer Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Hunter Innovations v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Ct.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- De Sousa v. Embassy of the Republic of AngolaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. S&A Pizza, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022