Legal Opinion

Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District v. Dequine Family L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 11, 2011No. 09SA118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats

The Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District appealed directly to this court from an order of the water court dismissing its application for a conditional water right. After presentation of the District's case, the court granted the opposer Dequine Family's C.R.C.P. 41(b) motion and dismissed for failure of the District to establish a need for water in the claimed amount sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the anti-speculation doctrine.

Because the District's evidence of existing demands included contracts for stored water that had admittedly not yet been put to beneficial use and for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burlington Ditch Reservoir & Land Co. v. Metro Wastewater Reclamation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Front Range Res., LLC v. Colo. Ground Water Comm'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Concerning the Application for Water Rights v. Raftopoulos Bros.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. Water & Sanitation Dist. v. Burlington Ditch Reservoir & Land CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API