Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from, Wilson District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts. The holder of negotiable paper as collateral security cannot sell the same, but must sue and collect. 1 Dan. Neg. Inst., § 833; Story, Bailm., §§ 318,321; 1 Chit. Cont., p. 670; Luok-etts v. Townsend, 3 Tex. 119; Cortelon v. Lansing, 2 Cain. Cas. 200; 2 Pars. Cont.

Read the full summary

Error from, Wilson District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action and the material facts. The holder of negotiable paper as collateral security cannot sell the same, but must sue and collect. 1 Dan. Neg. Inst., § 833; Story, Bailm., §§ 318,321; 1 Chit. Cont., p. 670; Luok-etts v. Townsend, 3 Tex. 119; Cortelon v. Lansing, 2 Cain. Cas. 200; 2 Pars. Cont. Ill, 118, 119; Jennison v. Parker, 7 Mich. 355. Pawnee cannot sell pledge of negotiable note (and an agreement to that effect is void), but must sue and collect on note. 2 Story, Eq. Jur., §§ 1008, 1009, 1019, 1031; Edw. Bailm.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, J.:

Robert Hunter brought this action against A. P. Hamilton to recover damages for the alleged wrongful sale and disposition of a pledge. The pledge was a promissory note for $250, executed by James H. White in favor of D. S. Kennett, who turned it over to Hamilton as collateral security for the payment of an indebtedness of $52, which Kennett owed Hamilton. Kennett sold the note to the plaintiff, Hunter, subject to the claim of Hamilton for $52, the payment of which Hunter assumed. White failed to pay the note when it became due, but no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. RigdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Larwill v. KirbyOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Brightman v. ReevesTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. LazenbyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Dunbar v. Commercial Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Baird v. OlsheskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. California Bank v. DanielArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Myers v. IsernSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API