Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ennis

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 5, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The accounting administrator has requested the court to determine the amount of any fee payable to attorneys who have asserted a claim against the estate for legal services. The facts developed at the hearing are contained in the main in affidavits of legal services received as exhibits in lieu of direct testimony and are that in the lifetime of this intestate the claimants were retained by the Argentine executor of the estate of the intestate’s late husband to collect assets in New York and thereafter, following the death of the intestate, the attorneys were requested by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. Nieman-Irving & Co. v. LazenbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of WinburnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Estate of ZieglerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API