Legal Opinion
Maiborne v. Kuntz
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 8, 1952PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
56 So.2d 720 (1952)
MAIBORNE
v.
KUNTZ.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
February 8, 1952.
Rehearing Denied February 29, 1952.
Edgar G. Hamilton and Irwin L. Langbein, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Williamson, Gunster & Baugher, Palm Beach, and Earnest, Lewis, Smith & Jones, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
MATHEWS, Justice.
This suit grew out of a dispute between two elderly men, Harry C. Maiborne and Charles Kuntz, Sr. Mr. Maiborne was a retired manufacturer of electrical appliances and Mr. Kuntz, Sr. was a retired manufacturer of hats. Kuntz stated that he had sold his business for a quarter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Montgomery v. KnoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Jones v. GreeleySupreme Court of Florida · 1889
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Fisher v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Burns v. GCC Beverages, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.