Legal Opinion

Smith v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1975No. 8126PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant recovered a verdict in this case in the amount of $7,000 against the District of Columbia for compensatory damages arising from a false arrest and assault. Appellant contends here that the trial court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of the District’s liability for punitive damages.

The clear weight of authority in the states is that as a general rule there can be no recovery of punitive damages against a municipality absent a statute expressly authorizing it. 1 There is no such statute in this jurisdiction. In Fisher v. City of Miami, 172 So.2d 455, 457 (Fla.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Fisher v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Hutchinson v. LottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Maurice Fox v. City of West Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Brown v. Village of DemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Daskalea v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API