Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Hodus
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1989No. 64A03-8808-CV-252PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
George Schultz appeals the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (Railroad) and Phyllis Kinder on his amended complaint for damages. This appeal raises two issues:
1. Whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the Railroad failed to provide him with a safe place to work.
Whether a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Kinder negligently operated her van. Affirmed.
On December 28, 1983, Schultz was an employee of the Railroad. On that date, he and three other Railroad employees were to be driven…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Orie W. Davis v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Nadine Payne, Administratrix of the Estate of Ralph T. Payne, Deceased v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Hawkins v. WhittenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. BeatyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Strutz v. McNagnyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Estate of WagersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Cole v. GohmannIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Florio v. TilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.