Legal Opinion

Scanlon v. Hartman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1978No. 76-159 L, SC 25228PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, J.,

Pro Tempore.

This personal injury action arose out of a collision between a truck and trailer (owned by defendant Mehrer and driven by defendant Hartman) and an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger. Liability was conceded by the defendants and the only issue at trial was the amount of damages, which the jury assessed at approximately $20,000.

The sole question on appeal is the admissibility of a doctor’s report written to plaintiff’s first attorney in which the doctor detailed the plaintiff’s complaints. We conclude that the letter/report was inadmissible, and reverse.

There…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Manchester Assur. Co. v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. FaschingOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Roach v. HockeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Jones v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Lancaster v. W.A. Hartzell & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Fessler v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API