Legal Opinion

Smart v. First Federal S & L Ass'n of Detroit

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 15, 1980No. Civ. 79-74483, 79-74646, 79-74804, 80-70101, 80-70143, 80-70169, 80-70246, 80-70269, 80-71370, 80-71530, 80-71536, 80-71559, 80-71596, 80-71799, 80-71816, 80-71863, 80-72015, 80-72028, 80-72269, 80-72270, 80-72336 and 80-72417PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GUY, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Court Rule XXIV, which governs the assignment of similar or related eases in this district, this court has been assigned twenty-two cases involving the validity and enforceability of the “due on sale” clauses 1 contained in certain mortgage agreements commonly used by federal savings and loan associations. All of the cases seek declaratory judgment relative to such clauses. Of the twenty-two cases filed, eighteen have been instituted by mortgagors and four have been commenced by federal savings and loan associations (hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983
  2. Chappell v. SCA Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1982
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. BurnsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Peay v. MortonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API