Legal Opinion
Shipman v. National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak)
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-0384PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KQLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
D’Rayfield Kary-Khame Shipman, proceeding pro se, brought this action against three defendants: his employer, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”); the union that represents him, the Transportation Communications Union/IAM (“TCU” or “Union”); and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), the agency charged with enforcing federal employment discrimination laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 1 While the precise nature of the claims against each defendant is not wholly clear…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jordan v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jordan v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018