Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor for the Benefit of Fair Housing of the Dakotas v. Riemers
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 2008No. 20070363PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Roland Riemers appeals the district court’s grant of default judgment against him. We affirm the judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In 2006, the Grand Forks Herald listed a classified advertisement for an apartment which included the words “No HAP.” The Fair Housing of the Dakotas filed a complaint with the North Dakota Department of Labor, alleging the advertisement violated N.D.C.C. § 14-02.5-03, because it discriminated against persons receiving public assistance. The North Dakota Department of Labor investigated the complaint, concluded the advertisement was made with respect to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lattanzio v. ComtaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HagermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Wetzel v. SchlenvogtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Messer v. BenderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wong v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Matter of HirschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Beeter v. Sawyer Disposal LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Gustafson v. Estate of PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Meier v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.