Steiner v. Windrow Estates Home Owners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant appeals a summary judgment order in a declaratory judgment action which determined that plaintiffs could keep the goats, Fred and Barney, on their property. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. Background
On or about 8 May 2009, plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-253 et. seq. seeking a declaration that certain restrictive covenants upon their real property (“Property”) were not enforceable against them. Plaintiffs alleged that they owned Property in a subdivision known as Windrow Estates, which is subject to “certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- WEIN II, LLC v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Production Systems, Inc. v. Amerisure InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Smith v. MarezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Bryan v. KittingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Bryan v. KittingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Eastern Pride, Inc. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.