Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Windrow Estates Home Owners Ass'n

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2011No. COA10-865PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant appeals a summary judgment order in a declaratory judgment action which determined that plaintiffs could keep the goats, Fred and Barney, on their property. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

On or about 8 May 2009, plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-253 et. seq. seeking a declaration that certain restrictive covenants upon their real property (“Property”) were not enforceable against them. Plaintiffs alleged that they owned Property in a subdivision known as Windrow Estates, which is subject to “certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. WEIN II, LLC v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Production Systems, Inc. v. Amerisure InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Smith v. MarezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Bryan v. KittingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Bryan v. KittingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Eastern Pride, Inc. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API