Legal Opinion
Hussey Copper, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 11, 1995No. Slip Op. 95-145. No. 91-12-00919PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DiCARLO, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs in this consolidated action, Hussey Copper, Ltd., The Miller Co., Outokumpu American Brass, Revere Copper Products, Inc., International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America (AFL-CIO), Mechanics Educational Society of America (Local 56), and United Steel Workers of America (AFL-CIO/CLC) (collectively Hussey), contest the redetermination filed pursuant to this court’s remand order in Hussey Copper, Ltd. v. United States, 18 CIT -, 852 F.Supp. 1116 (1994) (Hussey II), and seek…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shandong Huarong General Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Magnesuim Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Allied Tube and Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Viraj Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.