Legal Opinion
Isham v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided May 28, 2008No. 11-06-00311-CRPublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICK STRANGE, Justice.
The jury convicted Darrell Isham of manufacturing more than 400 grams of methamphetamine. The trial court sentenced Isham to life in prison and imposed a fine of $100,000. We find that the State has confessed error by failing to file a brief but affirm the conviction after an independent review because the evidence is legally and factually sufficient and because trial counsel was not constitutionally ineffective.
I. Procedural History
Isham was indicted for manufacturing 400 grams or more of methamphetamine by chemical synthesis. Isham initially elected to have the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Donjel Lamont Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
- Rafael Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
- Thomas Raymond Sennett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
- State v. Bounhiza, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.