State v. Bounhiza
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIANE M. HENSON, Justice.
This is an appeal from a trial court order granting appellee Abdelilah Bounhi-za’s motion for mistrial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court granted the motion after the jury found Bounhiza guilty of sexual assault, see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(1)(A) (West Supp. 2008), and before convening a punishment hearing. On appeal, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting a mistrial because: (1) Bounhiza did not present evidence establishing that his counsel provided ineffective assistance, and (2) even if Bounhiza’s counsel…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Wead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- Pete, Ex Parte AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- State v. Daniel Joe Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Byron Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Byron Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.