Legal Opinion

State v. Bounhiza

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 21, 2009No. 03-08-00261-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a trial court order granting appellee Abdelilah Bounhi-za’s motion for mistrial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court granted the motion after the jury found Bounhiza guilty of sexual assault, see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011(a)(1)(A) (West Supp. 2008), and before convening a punishment hearing. On appeal, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting a mistrial because: (1) Bounhiza did not present evidence establishing that his counsel provided ineffective assistance, and (2) even if Bounhiza’s counsel…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Wead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  2. Pete, Ex Parte AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. State v. Daniel Joe Hernandez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  4. Byron Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
  5. Byron Munoz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API