Legal Opinion

Blechschmidt v. Shatzer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2005No. 0108-08565; A121780PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioner, who was issued a 90-day drug-free zone (DFZ) exclusion notice under the provisions of former Portland City Code (PCC) chapter 14.100, appealed that exclusion to the City of Portland’s Code Hearings Office. The hearings officer affirmed the exclusion, and petitioner filed a petition for a writ of review and a complaint for declaratory relief with the circuit court. The circuit court reversed the hearings officer, declaring PCC chapter 14.100 unconstitutional. Respondent City of Portland now appeals. For the following reasons, we remand with instructions to vacate the judgment.

Initia…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Cottongim v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. STATE EX REL. STATE v. HawashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Housing Authority v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API