In re Get Young
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing to revoke an order granting letters of guardianship of a minor. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to revoke an order granting letters of guardianship of a minor.
The order made by the probate court appointing the *78guardian was one which it was within the jurisdiction of that tribunal to make, and it was itself appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963, subd. 3.)
Hence the appellate court will not entertain jurisdiction of the appeal now here. (Goyhinech v. Goyhinech, 80 Cal. 409; Larkin v. Larkin, 76 Cal. 323; Eureka & T. R. R. Co. v. McGrath, 74 Cal. 49; Tripp v. Santa Rosa R. R. Co., 69 Cal. 631.)
The matter does not come within the rule as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goyhinech v. GoyhinechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
- Eureka & Trinidad Railroad v. McGrathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Larkin v. LarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. VivasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
- Spurrier v. SpurrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- American Railroad Co. v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911
- American Railroad v. QuiñonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1911
- Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. VivasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914