Legal Opinion

Wallin v. Arcadia & Betsey River Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1912No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Manistee; Withey, J. Case by Charles A. Wallin against the Arcadia & Betsey River Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages for injuries received on February 19, 1909, while in the employ of defendant. Defendant operates a railroad 21 miles long between Copemish and Arcadia. Upon this road it runs a single mixed train, one round trip each day. The train crew at the time of the accident consisted of Conklin, the conductor, Lang, the engineer, and plaintiff, who acted as fireman on the road and brakeman at switching points. This position plaintiff had held for a total period of three years, one-half of which immediately preceded his injury. At Copemish there is a union…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Syneszewski v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Sipes v. Michigan Starch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. E. C. Clark Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Balderson v. Portland Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Edward v. Grand Haven Basket FactoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API