Legal Opinion

Balderson v. Portland Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by John C. Balderson against the Portland Telephone Company for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This suit was brought to recover damages for an injury which the plaintiff claims to have suffered by reason of the negligence of the defendant in the manner hereinafter described. The case was tried before a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the trial court, upon the motion of defendant’s counsel, directed a verdict for the defendant, on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and a judgment for defendant was entered.

At the time of the alleged injury the plaintiff resided upon a farm in the township of Portland, fronting on the highway extending…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Wolverton v. Village of SaranacMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Davis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McTiver v. Township of GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Friesenhan v. Michigan Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Teachout v. Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API