Legal Opinion

Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Pospeshil

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 35,857Published

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Plaintiff brought replevin for a Frigidaire, and, from summary judgment in favor of defendant, has appealed. The article was sold to Claire B. Whitney on conditional sales contract, which is urged to he a chattel mortgage and void against the defendant, as it was not filed.

The writing here is similar to those involved in Contractors Equipment Co. v. Reasner, 242 Mich. 589; Federal Com’l & Sav. Bank v. Internat'l Clay Machinery Co., 230 Mich. 33 (43 A. L. R. 1245), which were held to he agreements of conditional sale, and a like holding is made in this case. See, also, Nelson v. Viergiver, 230…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Nelson v. ViergiverMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In re Mutual Motors Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API