Legal Opinion

Military Toxics Project v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1998No. 97-1342PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Military Toxics Project seeks review of a final rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency establishing the circumstances in which military munitions are deemed hazardous waste for purposes of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq. See Military Munitions Rule, 62 Fed.Reg. 6622 (1997) (challenged portions codified at 40 C.F.R. Pt. 266). For the reasons set out below, we deny the petition for review.

I. BACKGROUND

The RCRA establishes a comprehensive program to regulate the handling of “solid waste,” a term defined broadly in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. Shaker Aamer v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API