Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Kolle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1947No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 43,483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an action for damages brought by plaintiff for an injury received as a result of colliding with an automobile.

Plaintiff claims that on January 4, 1944, at about the hour of 7 p.m., he stood on the southwest corner of Second street and West Grand Boulevard in the city of Detroit; that' he intended to cross the boulevard to the north; that on the south side of West Grand Boulevard there are four traffic lanes for traffic going east, each lane is about 10 feet in width; that on this occasion there was traffic in the first three lanes from the south; that he left the curb when he saw that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Scott v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Noonan v. VolekMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sewell v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gibbs v. Farmers' & Merchants' State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Wilhelm v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Trafamczak v. AnysMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Germiquet v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Rockwood v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API