Legal Opinion

In re Jayce O.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 2016No. SC19669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEspinosa, J.

The respondent mother, Kaitlyn J., appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her minor child, Jayce O. 1 The respondent contends that her right to due process under both the federal and state constitutions was violated because the trial court relied in part, pursuant to General Statutes (Supp. 2016) § 17a-112 (j) (3) (E), 2 on the prior voluntary termination of her parental rights with respect to another child when the respondent was a minor (prior termination).

The respondent also contends that the trial court, in its decision on the petition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. In re Alexander V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickau v. MingroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Jolley v. VintonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API