In re Campbell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ a Ckson, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office which affirmed that of the examiner rejecting, in view of the prior art, the single claim in the case which reads as follows:
1. The ornamental design for a metal capsule for compressed gases, as shown and described.
The references are:
Davison, 114,775, May 16, 1871.
Smalley, 601,988, April 5, 1898., Korrodi, 640,207, January 2, 1900.
Korrodi, 647,002, April 10, 1900.
Schworetzky, 1,559,052, October 27, 1925.
Meyer, Des. 85,487, November 3, 1931.
The application relates to a design for a metal capsule to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re GlavasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Sparklets Corporation v. Walter Kidde Sales Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Jas. H. Matthews & Co. v. Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Matter of the Application of Andrew GlavasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956