Jackson v. Hansard
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
The plaintiff in this case, Fred V. Jackson, brought this action to recover damages from the defendant, Dr. Hansard, on account of malpractice. He claims that on May 28,1929, while the defendant performed an operation on him for appendicitis, he negligently left a large sponge in the plaintiff’s abdominal cavity; that the sponge, or gauze —the terms being synonymous — gradually worked its way through the wall of the large intestines, about five feet in length, and was discharged from the intestines through the rectum on September 7, 1929, three months and ten days after the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Rayburn v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Caldwell v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Grant v. Touro InfirmarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Aderhold v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Brossard v. KoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.