Hortentia R. Acosta v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
Luis F. Acosta, plaintiff’s husband, disappeared on February 10, 1950, from his home in San Diego, California, and has not since been heard of or seen. When he vanished he was a retired naval enlisted man drawing retirement pay of $181.50 per month. After her husband had been gone for seven years, the plaintiff sought from a California state court a decree that he was legally dead. That court, on February 7, 1958, declared that Luis Acosta “be and hereby is declared legally dead”, without expressly indicating when the death occurred. Plaintiff was also designated administratrix…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Peak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. HaymanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Betty Joe Bowman v. Redding & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Midgett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Alexis I. Dupont De-Bie v. John F. Vredenburgh and Faith S. VredenburghCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Fontenot v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- MacMurray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.