Legal Opinion

Thompson, Weinman & Co. v. Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1963No. 7 Div. 542PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The question for decision is whether a city zoning ordinance providing for a one-family residence district, should be varied to permit the operation of a marble quarry within the district.

On August 23, 1960, E. I. Dison and Thompson, Weinman & Company filed application for an adjustment or variance of Article 2, §§ 14 and 21 of the Zoning Ordinance of Sylacauga, which became effective on December 4, 1958, as the same applied to the SW 14 of the NW 14 of Section 31, Township 21 South, Range 4 East, Talladega County, Alabama. On September 16, 1960, after due advertisement, the Board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Josephson v. AutreySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Board of Zoning Adjustment v. BoykinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Hampton v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Sherwood Realty Corp. v. FeriolaNew York Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Swann v. Bd. of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. CITY OF RUSSELLVILLE ZONING BD. v. VernonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Martin v. Board of Adjustment of EnterpriseCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Lawless v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API