Legal Opinion

Lawless v. Smith

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 27, 1985No. Civ. 5005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a zoning case.

The Board of Adjustment of the City of Tuscaloosa (Board) granted defendant Hamner a variance for the construction of a billboard on her property. Plaintiff, an adjacent landowner, appealed the Board's decision to the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County for a trial de novo, as provided by Ala. Code (1975), § 11-52-81.

After an ore tenus trial, the circuit court reversed the Board's action, finding that defendant was not entitled to a variance. The court ordered defendant to dismantle the sign immediately. It further found that the defendant was in contempt of a temporary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Priest v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  3. Tapley v. Liberty Super MarketsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Swann v. Bd. of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. In Re TarpleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Board of Zoning Adjus. v. Dauphin UphamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Board of Zoning Adjustment v. LaGrange ChurchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Ferraro v. BD. OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF BIRMINGHAMCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Gadsden Bd. of Adj. v. Vfw Post 8600Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API