Legal Opinion
State v. Arnheiter
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 1, 1991PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, Justice.
Marcus Arnheiter appeals pro se from a District Court (Bridgton, Henry, J.) order finding that he violated 29 M.R.S.A. § 1251 (1978) by travelling 71 m.p.h. in a 50 m.p.h. zone. The decision was affirmed by the Superior Court (Oxford County, Fritzsche, J.). Arnheiter now contests alleged irregularities in the initial trial and on appeal. Because we are not persuaded by his arguments, we affirm.
The only evidence presented by the State in its case-in-chief was the radar measurement. Arnheiter presented extensive testimony as to the unreliability of radar under the extant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. Couri Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. ReardonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. AntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CoombsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- State v. StadeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- State v. DeanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- State v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- State v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.