Legal Opinion

State v. Chase

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 9, 2017No. Docket: Pen-16-232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the following facts were established at trial by a preponderance of the evidence. See 29-A M.R.S. § 103(4) (2016); State v. Jeskey, 2016 ME 134, ¶ 2, 146 A.3d 127. On November 26, 2016, Daniel L. Chase approached a patrol sergeant with the University of Maine Police Department to report that he was operating his vehicle, a 1997 Dodge Ram pickup truck, with an expired registration. The sergeant confirmed that Chase’s registration had expired between 30 and 150 days earlier, and gave Chase a warning that he needed to register…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. State v. ArnheiterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. State of Maine v. Roxanne JeskeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. Marie J. (Marchiori) Eremita v. Cristiano A. MarchioriSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. York Hospital v. Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Christopher RaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  2. State v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. State of Maine v. Brandon Oakley McCoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026
  4. State of Maine v. Daniel L. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API