Legal Opinion

Niehaus v. Cedar Bridge, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 5, 2006No. 03-05-00334-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

Appellants Edwin Niehaus, Carrie Wong, and William Ryan appeal the denial of their special appearances. Appellee Cedar Bridge, Inc., sued appellants in their individual capacities, along with their company, Niehaus Ryan Wong, Inc. (“NRW”), based on the breach of a commercial lease. Cedar Bridge asserts that appellants are individually liable because they engaged in a fraudulent transfer of corporate assets that resulted in NRW’s inability to pay rent to Cedar Bridge. Appellants contend that they are not amenable to suit in Texas because they are California…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Cerbone v. Farb, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  3. In Re Estate of Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  4. Leesboro Corp. v. Hendrickson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  5. Luxury Travel Source v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API