Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 4 Div. 243PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The State contends that when a forgery -of an instrument is charged in an indictment as a warrant on the county treasurer signed by the probate judge and indorsed by two named persons, or the utterance of such instrument, a conviction can be sustained though the warrant was genuine, if defendant merely forged the names of the indorsers or uttered it with knowledge that their names had been forged.

But if the instrument as a whole, including the indorsements, is alleged to have been forged, some authorities hold that the indictment is sustained on proof that it was the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Saucier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cochran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. State v. HearnOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Wyatt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Lunceford v. City of NorthportCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API