Coyne v. Simrall Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
The' Simrall Corporation filed its complaint against friendly and hostile defendants, asking that the court adjudge a certain provision in an oil lease to be invalid, and for an injunction, accounting, and appointment of a trustee. The district court held that the provision in question, relating to apportionment of royalties under a pro rata, pool arrangement, did not control the rights of subsequent grantees, whose deeds recited that they were subject to the lease; and on amended pleadings, asking reformation, the court removed the restrictions of the pool provision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Retan v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Conlin v. MasecarMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foertsch v. SchausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rauner v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Levy v. Dossin's Food ProductsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1947
- Tower Automotive, Inc. v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003