Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Simrall Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1944No. 9596PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.

The' Simrall Corporation filed its complaint against friendly and hostile defendants, asking that the court adjudge a certain provision in an oil lease to be invalid, and for an injunction, accounting, and appointment of a trustee. The district court held that the provision in question, relating to apportionment of royalties under a pro rata, pool arrangement, did not control the rights of subsequent grantees, whose deeds recited that they were subject to the lease; and on amended pleadings, asking reformation, the court removed the restrictions of the pool provision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Retan v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Conlin v. MasecarMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foertsch v. SchausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rauner v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Levy v. Dossin's Food ProductsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1947
  4. Tower Automotive, Inc. v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API