Tower Automotive, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.
This insurance coverage dispute is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow the Court concludes there is no coverage for the loss at issue.
I
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff Tower Automotive, Inc. (“Tower”) manufactures parts for the automotive industry. Defendant American Protection Insurance Company (“American Protection”) insured Tower under an “all risks” property insurance policy that expired on September 30,1999.
Tower utilized Marsh USA, Inc. (“Marsh”), an independent insurance…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roundabout Theatre Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- UNIVERSAL IMAGE PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. Chubb Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010