Trantham v. Elk Furniture Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
Tbe only point presented in tbe case is based upon tbe following facts: “Tbe jury then came into tbe court, and tbrougb its foreman, banded tbe presiding judge tbe issues. Tbe first issue, answered 'No.’ Tbe other issues are not answered. "Whereupon, stated tbe court, 'You answer tbe first issue “No,” all of you say that?’ And tbe jury said, 'Yes.’ Counsel for tbe plaintiff then moved tbe court to have tbe jury polled; whereupon tbe presiding judge requested tbe jury to stand, and said to tbe jury: 'As many of you as now favor to answer tbe issue “Yes” will say “Yes,” and those who favor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
- Lowe v. . DorsettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. McVaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. McKissickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.