Legal Opinion

Olympia Capital Associates, L.P. v. Jackson

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 3, 2008No. 05-06-00479-CVPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

Daniel L. Jackson, as receiver for Integral Arbitrage, L.P., Integral Hedging, L.P., Integral Equity, L.P., Integral Investment Management, L.P., and Integral Management, L.L.C., (“Receiver”) filed suit against Olympia Capital Associates, L.P. (“Associates”) and Olympia Capital International, Inc. (“International”). The trial court denied Associates’s special appearance and granted International’s. Associates and the Receiver appeal the respective orders. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that International’s and Associates’s contacts with Texas are…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. West v. SMG, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  2. Max Protetch, Inc. v. Herrin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Nogle & Black Aviation, Inc. v. Faveretto Ex Rel. Migliori, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Citrin Holdings, LLC v. Minnis, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. KC Smash 01, LLC v. Gerdes, Hendrichson, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API