Legal Opinion

Wm. D. Perkins & Co. v. Diking District No. 3

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1931No. 22863. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This is a suit in equity, instituted by appellant for a mandatory injunction to compel respondents, the diking commissioners, to make further levies, and to compel respondent, the county treasurer, to collect unpaid taxes, in order to raise funds with which to pay outstanding unpaid bonds of the diking districts held by appellant and others.

Diking District No. 3 of Island county is a municipal corporation, organized for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a dike; and, in order to pay for the construction of the dike, it duly issued, on May 22, 1916, one hundred sixty-six negotiable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Clay v. Selah Valley Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Behrens v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Espy Estate Co. v. Pacific CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elston v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Lew You Ying v. Lew KayWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fahrenwald v. Spokane Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Cannery Workers & Farm Laborers Union, Local 7 v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. South Seattle Land Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API