Legal Opinion

Espy Estate Co. v. Pacific County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1905No. 5513PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Irwin, J., entered October 15, 1905, dismissing a proceeding for a writ of mandamus, upon, sustaining demurrers to the petition.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This proceeding was brought in the superior court for a writ of mandate requiring the county commissioners of Pacific county to establish a ditch fund, and to make a special assessment, under the provisions of the act of March 19, 1895 (Laws 1895, p. 142), to pay certain warrants, issued in part payment for the construction of a ditch, and owned by appellant. These warrants were issued in the year 1893, and amount to about $1,600, face value, besides interest amounting to nearly as much more. Under the act of March 19, 1890, said county had created a drainage district and partially completed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Askam v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Skagit County v. StilesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. American Bridge Co. v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crouse v. NixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Shuttee v. Coalgate Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Wm. D. Perkins & Co. v. Diking District No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Ames v. County of LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Seymour v. SlaterWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API